Menu Content/Inhalt
Filipino Entrepreneurs (Philippines)

Sponsored Links

Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 (Bouncing Checks Law; full text) Print E-mail
BATAS PAMBANSA BLG. 22

Ac Act Penalizing the Making or Drawing and Issuance of a Check Without Sufficient Funds or Credit and for Other Purposes
 
(Related post: Bouncing Checks [BP 22]
 
Section 1. Checks without sufficient funds. - Any person who makes or draws and issues any check to apply on account or for value, knowing at the time of issue that he does not have sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank for the payment of such check in full upon its presentment, which check is subsequently dishonored by the drawee bank for insufficiency of funds or credit or would have been dishonored for the same reason had not the drawer, without any valid reason, ordered the bank to stop payment, shall be punished by imprisonment of not less than thirty days but not more than one (1) year or by a fine of not less than but not more than double the amount of the check which fine shall in no case exceed Two Hundred Thousand Pesos, or both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the court.

The same penalty shall be imposed upon any person who, having sufficient funds in or credit with the drawee bank when he makes or draws and issues a check, shall fail to keep sufficient funds or to maintain a credit to cover the full amount of the check if presented within a period of ninety (90) days from the date appearing thereon, for which reason it is dishonored by the drawee bank.

Where the check is drawn by a corporation, company or entity, the person or persons who actually signed the check in behalf of such drawer shall be liable under this Act.
 
Section 2. Evidence of knowledge of insufficient funds. - The making, drawing and issuance of a check payment of which is refused by the drawee because of insufficient funds in or credit with such bank, when presented within ninety (90) days from the date of the check, shall be prima facie evidence of knowledge of such insufficiency of funds or credit unless such maker or drawer pays the holder thereof the amount due thereon, or makes arrangements for payment in full by the drawee of such check within (5) banking days after receiving notice that such check has not been paid by the drawee.

Section 3
. Duty of drawee; rules of evidence. - It shall be the duty of the drawee of any check, when refusing to pay the same to the holder thereof upon presentment, to cause to be written, printed, or stamped in plain language thereon, or attached thereto, the reason for drawee's dishonor or refusal to pay the same: Provided, That where there are no sufficient funds in or credit with such drawee bank, such fact shall always be explicitly stated in the notice of dishonor or refusal.

In all prosecutions under this Act, the introduction in evidence of any unpaid and dishonored check, having the drawee's refusal to pay stamped or written thereon or attached thereto, with the reason therefor as aforesaid, shall be prima facie evidence of the making or issuance of said check, and the due presentment to the drawee for payment and the dishonor thereof, and that the same was properly dishonored for the reason written, stamped or attached by the drawee on such dishonored check.

Not with standing receipt of an order to stop payment, the drawee shall state in the notice that there were no sufficient funds in or credit with such bank for the payment in full of such check, if such be the fact.

Section 4. Credit construed. - The word "credit" as used herein shall be construed to mean an arrangement or understanding with the bank for the payment of such check.

Section 5. Liability under the Revised Penal Code. - Prosecution under this Act shall be without prejudice to any liability for violation of any provision of the Revised Penal Code.

Section 6. Separability clause. - If any separable provision of this Act be declared unconstitutional, the remaining provisions shall continue to be in force.

Section 7. Effectivity. - This Act shall take effect fifteen days after publication in the Official Gazette.

Approved: April 3, 1979.
Published in : Business Laws and Regulations, Money, Banking and Finance

Users' Comments (13)
Posted by Glenda, on 25-03-2009,
Atty. nag issue po ako ng checks na inutangan ko dhil requirements nila na tseke din nila within the company. nagbounced na po cya pero may naiwan po ako fund na 4T. cmula ng magbounced cya binabayaran ko po cya sa abot na kaya ko.pero they keep on harassing my kids and my 74 yrs. old mom.Minumura at lahat ng pangit na salita pumupunta p cla sa haus walang ginawa kundi manakot eh tuloy tuloy naman bayad ko delayed nga lang ng 2mos. para sa kabuuang halaga. Ipapakulong daw po ako at hahakutin lahat ng gamit ko eh ang balance ko na lang naman at nasa 14T na lang. Naaawa ako sa mga nak ko takot.
 

Posted by jenny, on 17-03-2009,
I avail a salary loan from a bank. As a procedure they asked me to issue a check for 24 mons to pay them the said loan. I need to put some funds on the checks that I issued. During the first year I was able to pay them every due date but this past few months I am having a hard time paying them due to financial issues. Now, the checks are bouncing and they are suing me for that. Im trying my best to pay them but I can't afford to pay them the required amount that they are asking me to pay. I just want to ask if that is the case can the bank still charged me of estafa and put me in jail?
 

Posted by teresa, on 02-03-2009,
hi po,i work as a collector in a collection agency,ang nature po ng work ko ay maningil ng mga taong may utng sa bangko, gusto ko lang po malaman kung may nakukulong po ba sa utang or may required minimum amount ba or magkano ang amount na nautang upang ang nangutang ay maaaring makulong?pwede po pki email sakin ang maaring ikaso sa kanila at ano ang kaukulang parusa?asap lang po salamat
 

Posted by Rose, on 23-02-2009,
Sir/Maam Good day. May umutang po sa akin ng halagang P150.000 1year contract w/ 10%interest 6months okey naman po yung check nila,pero lately d na tinanggap ng bank kasi daw po close acct na. Yung amount loan ay dated april 30,2009(150.000)yung contrata din matapus sa petsa n yun.Ano po ang chances ko nbayaran nila? 6months n sila d nagbayd ng 10 interest,May chance b ako makuha ang pera ko?pwede ba sila makulong? pwede po ba makuha ang bahay nila.?lahat kasi nang colllateral nila bininta na nila. Ang hawak ko lang yung check na 150,000 and 15,000. Pls need your advice...Rose
 

Posted by roland jenner, on 18-02-2009,
ano po ba kilangan na ivedence para makulong ung tao na nag issue ng bouncing check?
 

Posted by HONEY MAE SILVA, on 22-12-2008,
atty, good day tanong ko lang po if it is true na mahirap when it comes case if ang nakalagay na payee sa check ay cash?
 

Posted by Andrea, on 11-12-2008,
atty, kumuha po kme ng loan ng office mate ko after 1 yr of continious paying bigla po nhinto ang pagbbayad nya tpos ang blita ko nlang po wla na sya d2 s pinas kya po ako ang namrublema sa payments ang problem po eh di ko mprovide mkapagbyad ng buo kya madalas delayed ang payment ko, may chance po bang mahabol sya since sya nman po nagprovide ng check? Pls advise me po what to do. maraming salamat po
 

Posted by Tin, on 16-11-2008,
Would like to inquire if BP 22 was violated however small payments are still being paid in lieu of the checks issued based on whatever capacity the maker have, would it still constitute the basis for suing the maker? Even with the small payments being made, the payees kept on pressuring the maker to pay in full knowing that it is beyond the capacity of the maker. Can they do that?  
 
Another question would be, should the court decided on the fine and imprisonment, how would the court expect the maker pay for the fine if there is no income coming?
 

Posted by iska, on 16-11-2008,
atty, ngco-maker po ako last year at tinakbuhan ako nung pinagco-sign ko. so,kasi yung mismong principal borrower ndi nila hinabol e nasa nueva ecija lang nman yun, binigay na nmin yung address. so para iwas hassle sa part ko kahit ayaw ko magbayad, i started paying last feb to sept 2008, kaya lang nagstop ako at nakiusap kung pede ipay ko na lang pagnaka-pera na ulit. ayaw nila pumayag at idedemanda na daw nila ako for estafa. E 8K na lng naman yung balance ko. Possible pa rin ba nilang gawin yun? E continous naman yung payment ko, ndelay lang nito. Please advise.
 

Posted by neth, on 19-09-2008,
sir, 
 
ask ko lang po regarding case BP 22 kung ung taong gusto ko ng kasuhan nag file nako sa fiscal kaso di po napapakita balita ko wala sa pinas ano pong mangyayari sa case nya ibabasura ba ng fiscal ang case o maglalabas sila ng search warrant? 
 
Please po paki reply nalang para may idea ako. 
 
thanks  
 
neth
 

More comments...

Add your comment

 

Related posts:

Newer posts:

< Prev   Next >